ETH Zurichi master’s students’ visions for the Louis Kahn Center; Semester projects by the Oslo School of Architecture and Design (AHO) on the possibility of productive housing in Kuressaare. See visitors info: https://linnus.samu.ee/en/visitors-info/
Photos: Henry Tiirik

Louis I. Kahni Centre?

Architect Louis I. Kahn is certainly one of the best known and most influential figures on world culture born in Estonia throughout history. The global significance of his teachings and work, the great number of admirers in every corner of the world, is the impulse that has encouraged the Louis Kahn Foundation in Estonia to work for several years on the idea of establishing the Kahn Centre in Saaremaa.

Kahn has stood the test of time with his work and teachings, has become a classic, and he is returned to again and again as a spiritual source.

But where is this source, this place of pilgrimage to come to?
Kahn was fond of stressing the importance of the beginning and the search for truth from the beginning. His birthplace, Kuressaare, is undoubtedly the symbolic beginning of Kahn’s journey.
At the moment, there is no spiritual beacon on the horizon in Estonia towards which to move, which would carry a positive and forward-looking dimension, which would unite both local and international communities and put Estonia as a country on the international map in a positive sense. The Kahn Centre combines all these qualities and has the potential to make
Saaremaa and Estonia something that it is not yet known for.

There is international expectation for the Kahn Centre and it is an opportunity for Saaremaa, for Estonia and for all of us.

Visions for the Louis Kahn Center

Background:
Saaremaa-the birthplace of American architect Louis I. Kahn. Here lies the vision and opportunity to establish a European cultural museum that goes far beyond a traditional exhibition: a cultural center that serves as a conduit for Louis Kahn’s intellectual legacy and as a place of exchange for architecture enthusiasts as well as the local population.
The Bay of Kuressaare inspires us-while carefully incorporating the local context-to consider new programming and explore the possibilities of a contemporary reinterpretation of the museum. Light, wind, and water are the defining elements that constitute the genius loci of this place.

Together with the distinctive Nordic light, they create a space with extraordinary potential for generating powerful and memorable atmospheres. Overarching visions for the site itself are linked to in-depth individual projects, through which we sharpen our awareness of how to work with finite and recyclable material resources. Starting from something immeasurable – a fascination – we approach the task through the themes of material, light, and space. How can we, as young architects, critically yet optimistically envision the future of such a place-striking a balance between preservation, further development, and innovation?
How can we create independent structures that neither reduce what already exists to a mere backdrop nor simply tear it down to create a void for new abundance?

Statement:

The resulting projects demonstrate different ways of reimagining Kuressaare as a cultural hub.
What they have in common is a thoughtful engagement with the landscape and the unique conditions of Saaremaa.

Topography, open spaces, light, wind, and water do not merely serve as a backdrop; they become integral elements of the design themselves. The choice of materials is also rooted in the local context.

The students explored resources characteristic of Estonia and the regional context, examining their origins, processing, and reusability. Materials are thus understood not merely in structural terms, but as conveyors of atmosphere, identity, and a conscious attitude toward existing resources.

The projects respond to the landscape in various ways: they blend in, create transitions, densify or open up spaces, and in doing so enhance the existing spatial qualities. The result is architecture that does not overwhelm the site, but rather develops from its unique character and facilitates new relationships between landscape, space, and use. Louis Kahn’s intellectual legacy is understood less as a formal model and more as an impetus for a deeper engagement with material, light, space, and atmosphere. This initial fascination with Kuressaare has thus given rise to a variety of independent projects. They demonstrate how architecture can emerge from a precise reading of a place-not as a response that imposes something on it, but as a careful extension of its existing qualities.

Brief Statement:

The projects read Kuressaare through its landscape, its spatial qualities, and its site-specific resources. Louis Kahn’s intellectual legacy serves as an impulse to rethink material, light, and space through the specific conditions of the place. In this way, architectures have emerged that do not impose themselves on what is already there, but carefully carry it forward.
Productive Housing

Semester projects by the Oslo School of Architecture and Design (AHO) on the possibility of productive housing in Kuressaare

The students arrived in Kuressaare with an unusual starting point. Before knowing the site, they had already spent several weeks developing an architectural idea through investigations of a spatial idea, a structural daylight and structure. They therefore arrived with something specific through which they could begin to read the place. principle and a particular daylight condition
The study trip became an important moment in this process. Walking through Kuressaare and the surrounding landscape, the students encountered the diffuse light, the flat landscape, reeds, limestone, wind and water, but also local ways of building, cultivating, repairing and adapting to seasonal change. Their initial architectural ideas became a way of looking more closely at these conditions, while the encounter with the place, in turn, challenged and transformed those ideas.

(The seminar title, Places that Create Happiness, raises a larger question: what does it mean to dwell well, and how can architecture contribute?)

Through the theme of Productive Housing, productivity gradually took on different meanings in the students’ projects. Daylight could be understood as a resource; the landscape as productive ground; architecture as a framework for working, growing, making, gathering and sharing. The projects introduce new architectural propositions, but these develop through a close reading of what is already there.

Perhaps this reciprocal relationship is one of the most important outcomes of the studio: architecture as both a way of understanding a place and a way of imagining how we might dwell there in new ways.

Students:Adena Aanerud, Astri Sunde Brynhildsrud, Roman Diener, Apena Vigdís Egertsdóttir, Hedda Talmoen Emanuelsen, Maëlle Favier, Elsa Sara Lydia Lovisa Fredriksson, Hedda Lie Gullestad, Malwina Jadczak, Emanuel Victor Kjellberg, Odin Mellado Kjørlien, Élia Martí Sancho, Sirin Aune Nordli, Giovanna Peschiera, Anna Stamalkova, Malika Sungatullina, Adrian Bjørkli, Nora Valmestadrød, Olivia Von Zedtlitz-Neukirchen
Teachers: Kathrine Næss, Cathrine Vigander, Sareh Saeidi, Tobias Kristiansen